Ban boycotts, ban free speech

Ban boycotts, ban free speech
  1. Ban boycotts, ban free speech
    Trade figures show that the BDS is having an imperceptible effect on the Israeli economy. So why are Israel, many American states, and, here, the US Congress taking such effortful risks to try to outlaw the practice and proposals of boycott while the same people support a harsh boycott of…

Three articles on the proposed bill to outlaw the practice of or proselytising for any form of boycotting anything Israeli : 1) clear account of the bill in the New Arab;  2) WAFA on the withdrawal of one of the sponsors; 3) That sponsor, Kirsten Gillibrand, explains her decision in Forward.

Jewish and Christian religious groups demonstrate in support of Israel near the United Nations headquarters September 21, 2011 in New York. Photo by Stan Honda/AFP/Getty Images

Anti-BDS bill in US Congress: Criminalising Free Speech

The anti-BDS bill violates the right to collective action which is protected under the US constitution

By Tamara Kharroub, The New Arab August 03, 2017

Bills introduced in the US Congress seek to criminalise support for the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movements, calling to pressure Israel to end abuses of Palestinians’ human rights.

The Senate bill, Israel Anti-Boycott Act (S.720), was introduced in the US Senate by Democratic Senator from Maryland Benjamin Cardin on 23 March 2017. The bill’s number of cosponsors has been rising steadily since then, reaching 46 currently; 32 Republican and 14 Democratic Senators, which constitutes close to half the Senate.

A similar bill, the Israel Anti-Boycott Act (H.R.1697) was also introduced in the US House of Representatives on the same day by Peter Roskam, Republican Representative of Illinois’s 6th District. The House bill has 249 cosponsors; 185 Republicans and 64 Democrats, constituting close to 60 percent of the House.

The bills were introduced at the time of the annual conference of the powerful pro-Israel lobbying group the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in March, and match one of its lobbying agenda [see below] items for 2017. The bills are even said to have been drafted with the help of AIPAC.

Israel Anti-Boycott have collected co-sponsors from across the political spectrum in the US, including right-wing and moderate Republicans as well as moderate and liberal Democrats. The support that this proposal enjoys confirms AIPAC’s powerful position in Washington, where this might be the lone instance of bipartisanship in US Congress.

The support that this proposal enjoys confirms AIPAC’s powerful position in Washington

Although they garner great support and popularity among Members of Congress, the bills have been heavily criticised by proponents of civil liberties for their infringement on the freedom of speech and by several groups for conflating Israel with illegal Israeli settlement in the West Bank and East Jerusalem with Israel.

The Israel Anti-Boycott Act

The Israel Anti-Boycott Act of 2017 seeks to amend previous legislation, namely the Export Administration Act of 1979 and the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945, to include prohibitions on boycotting Israel.

The Act would essentially prohibit US citizens and entities from supporting a boycott against Israel, conducted by foreign governments or international governmental organisations such as the UN and the EU. In these bills, Israel is discussed to include illegal Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

If the bill is amended to subject violators to ‘civil penalties’, that still means $250,000 in fines for expressing political views

According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), violators will be fined a maximum civil penalty of $250,000 with a maximum criminal penalty of $1 million, and 20 years imprisonment. The House and Senate bills would also expand the previous laws to include a penalty for requesting information about the boycott.

Opposition to the bills


L, ACLU’s National Political Director Faiz Shakir, urges Representatives NOT to support anti-boycott bill. The bill “targets free speech and political beliefs”


In the letter to Congress members, ACLU’s National Political Director Faiz Shakir urges members of Congress not to co-sponsor or support the Israel Anti-Boycott Act of 2017. While the ACLU clarifies that the union takes no political position on the matter, the letter warns that the bill “would impose civil criminal punishment on individuals solely because if their political beliefs about Israel and its policies”.

Under this act, the lack of business relations with Israel is only fined when it is politically motivated. According to Shakir, such punishment of entities based on political views is unconstitutional as it violates the First Amendment and the right to free speech and expression.

The proposals also violate the right to collective action, as a form of expression. As such, individuals protesting Israeli settlement policies would be subjected to severe fines under this bill.

Other organisations have also come out against the bills.

The self-identified “pro-Israel pro-peace” group, J Street, which does not endorse BDS, issued a document detailing concerns about the legislative proposals. Most specifically, J Street expressed concern about blurring the US legal distinction between Israeli settlements and Israel, and thus breaking with established US policy of 50 years and making it a federal crime to boycott settlements.

This essentially limits freedoms for academic discussion and the free exchange of ideas at academic institutions

The proposals currently under consideration in Congress would also threaten academic freedom, and used to punish faculty, students and the American universities that host them, for expressing certain points of view regarding the boycott of Israel. This essentially limits freedoms for academic discussion and the free exchange of ideas at academic institutions.

Possible amendments?

Following the ACLU letter, the primary sponsors of the Senate bill, Benjamin Cardin and Republican Senator from Ohio Rob Portman, sent a response letter to Faiz Shakir claiming that the bill does not infringe on free speech rights or punish entities for their political views on Israel. The senators insist that the bill is based on already existing laws and is “narrowly targeted at commercial activity”.

Senator Ben Cardin, proposer of a bill to outlaw imposing boycotts on Israel, speaks for maintaining sanctions against Russia on NBC news. Screenshot.

However, those seemingly minor amendments to existing laws have potential major constitutional violations. ACLU responded with an op-ed confirming that collective actions such as boycott are protected under the US constitution. “When government takes sides on a particular boycott and criminalises those who engage in a boycott, it crosses a constitutional line”, David Cole and Faiz Shakir of the ACLU said, adding that the bill “does not target commercial trade; it targets free speech and political beliefs”.

Legal experts have also noted that the term “United States person” includes US residents or nationals, businesses and foreign subsidiaries of a US business.

Opponents of Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s executive order prohibiting state investments in any company that supports a boycott of Israel hold a rally in the War Room at the New York state Capitol on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, in Albany, N.Y. Photo by Mike Groll/AP

Members of Congress co-sponsoring the bills have also faced questions from their constituents regarding ACLU’s constitutional concerns. Some have even reported that lawmakers have rushed to sign as cosponsors of the AIPAC-drafted bills without being aware of their contents.

Following the ACLU’s public opposition to the bills, lawmakers are put under pressure to consider amendments that address ACLU’s concerns. Members of Congress said they are reviewing the bill and discussing possible First Amendment issues. Cardin himself expressed willingness to consider amendments, saying he only thought the bill involves civil penalties not criminal penalties.

The criminalisation of political activism against Israeli policies is taking place across the United States and Europe

However, if the bill is amended to subject violators to civil penalties, that still means $250,000 in fines for expressing political views.

While some amendments to the House and Senate bills may occur, the issue is far from over. The US Congress has passed bills that seek to combat BDS in the past and it is likely to pass future bills in some form.

The criminalisation of political activism against Israeli policies is taking place across the United States and Europe, with arrests, restrictions on freedom of the press and collective action, and outlawing organisations that support Palestinian rights.

What form of the Israel Anti-Boycott Act bills will pass in US Congress is yet to be seen, but this will not be the last bill targeting activism in support of Palestinian rights.

Dr. Tamara Kharroub is a Senior Analyst and Assistant Executive Director at Arab Center Washington DC.

US Senator withdraws sponsorship of an Israel anti-boycott bill

By WAFA (Palestine news and info. centre) August 03, 2017

WASHINGTON, DC, — New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D) has formally withdrawn her sponsorship of the Israel Anti-Boycott Act following pressure from constituents who repeatedly questioned her support for the bill at recent town halls in New York City, according to a press release.

Residents were concerned about threats the bill could cause to the civil liberties of Americans and to the grassroots boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement for Palestinian rights.

Senator Gillibrand’s withdrawal marks one of the few times a member of Congress has removed their name from a bill supported by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).

The Israel Anti-Boycott Act, which raised protests from civil liberties groups such as the ACLU, attempts to criminalize Americans who support Palestinian human rights. It seeks to impose fines of up to $1 million and up to 20 years in prison, as well as to deny government loans to corporations refusing to do business in Israeli settlements built on stolen Palestinian land in violation of international law and nearly 50 years of official US policy.

Not only does it infringe on the First Amendment-protected right to promote BDS but the bill also seeks to legitimize Israel’s settlements. The language of the Israel Anti-Boycott Act equates illegal Israeli settlements with Israel, breaking with decades of US policy of refusing to recognize settlements as legally part of Israel.

“It’s exceedingly rare for members of Congress to withdraw their sponsorship of bills, especially on this issue,” stated Josh Ruebner, Policy Director of the US Campaign for Palestinian Rights. “We thank Sen. Gillibrand for listening to her constituents’ concerns about this bill and removing her sponsorship after realizing the draconian nature of the penalties it would impose on individuals exercising their First Amendment right to engage in boycotts in support of Palestinian human rights.”

Sen. Gillibrand’s withdrawal comes after pressure from national and grassroots organizers mobilized with support from the US Campaign for Palestinian Rights, including WESPAC, Adalah-NY, Jewish Voice for Peace-Westchester, and Peace Action NY.

In front of a large crowd in Queens on July 24 and in response to local activists questioning her support for the bill, Sen. Gillibrand stated that she would not support it in its current form, strongly refusing to “support any bill that chills free speech.” In addition, the American Civil Liberties Union sent an open letter to members of Congress urging them to refrain from sponsorship on July 17.

The US Campaign for Palestinian Rights (USCPR) is a national coalition of hundreds of groups working together for freedom, justice and equality. Founded in 2001 as the US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation, USCPR has been a leading player in the movement for Palestinian rights in the United States. The coalition is bound by commonly shared principles on Palestine solidarity as well as anti-racism principles.

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand: Where I Stand On Israel, BDS And The First Amendment

By Kirsten Gillibrand, Forward August 10, 2017

L. Kirsten Gillibrand. Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Over the past few weeks, a divisive debate has erupted that is pitting defenders of the First Amendment against supporters of Israel. This is a false choice, and many New Yorkers who care deeply about both Israel and free speech are finding themselves caught in the middle of an argument where people aren’t listening to one another. For example, recently I have been accused of trying to stifle people’s right to protest, of trying to delegitimize one of our most important allies, and of supporting a movement that is working to harm the State of Israel. These accusations are false, and I reject the notion that we must choose between equally supporting Israel and the First Amendment.

The debate is over a bill, called the Israel Anti-Boycott Act, which was written with the good intention of pushing back against the anti-Israel boycott, divestment and sanctions movement, better known as BDS. The bill takes an existing law that says Americans shouldn’t be able to side with foreign countries to undermine our allies, and expands it to include international organizations like the European Union and the United Nations.

I signed onto it because I have always supported Israel and opposed BDS. But when constitutional lawyers expressed alarm that the bill could have a chilling effect on the First Amendment, I took their concerns seriously. That is not how I interpreted the bill language, and I still don’t interpret it that way, but it’s clear to me that if reasonable people can come to diametrically different conclusions about what the bill does, then the bill as written is too ambiguous and needs to be written more clearly.

As I said publicly at a town hall, I cannot support the bill in its current form if it can be interpreted as stifling or chilling free speech. I would never put my name on legislation that would do that. So I took my name off the bill – until it is rewritten so the text is clear that it won’t violate our right to free speech. That doesn’t mean my positions on Israel or BDS have changed. To the contrary: they haven’t budged an inch.

So let’s clear some things …

  1. Armenian Girls Team Wins Award for Armenian Sign Language App - Politics
    08.16 / 22:12
    Students from the Vahan Tekeyan School in the Karbi village of Aragatsotn region were selected as finalists of the 2017 Technovation Challenge, an all-girls international competition, winning the People’s Choice Award for an app to help people learn Armenian Sign Language, Asbarez reports. The competition was held from August 7 to August 11 in Silicon Valley. The team, which called itself “One Step Ahead,” included Aghavni Hakobyan, Sona Avetisyan, Svetlana Davtyan and Violeta Mkrtchyan and…
  2. Turkey asks Germany for extradition of top coup suspect - Politics
    08.16 / 22:12
    Ankara has formally requested that Berlin arrest and extradite a man suspected of playing a major role in last year’s failed coup, Deutsche Welle reports. Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu said on Wednesday that Turkey sent a diplomatic note to Germany, demanding the extradition of fugitive Adil Oksuz. Cavusoglu told broadcaster TRT Haber that Ankara sent the note following reports that Oksuz was seen in Germany. “If this person is there, we asked that he be located, …
  3. Trainings for IT beginners are underway in Gyumri - Politics
    08.16 / 22:12
    Trainings for IT beginners are held in Gyumri since April, Panorama reports. The trainings are organized by the “D-Link International”, “Instigate Design” and “Develandoo” companies. The programs of “Instigate Training Center” are at the basis of the course. The classes take place at the research center of “D-Link International” in Gyumri. The staff of “Instigate Design” and “D-Link International” companies performs as teachers. According to the public communications service of UITE, 22 stu…
  4. TPLF Imposed Travel Ban on High Level Officials - Politics
    08.16 / 22:06
    BY ESAT NEWS A travel ban has been imposed on high level TPLF officials, family members and accomplices suspected of embezzlement as part of the ongoing campaign against corruption in Ethiopia, which critics say has so far targeted small-time scoundrels and left top TPLF officials who are widely accused of pocketing millions of dollars untouchable.… The post TPLF Imposed Travel Ban on High Level Officials appeared first on…
  5. Endeavours Toward Ensuring Food Security - Politics
    08.16 / 22:06
    BY SEMHAR MEBRAHTU | SHABAIT Ensuring food security is the ultimate goal of the Eritrean government besides other national developments. The government establishes good ties with organizations to its projects. VITA, the Irish NGO, sent delegations to Eritrea to identify areas for intervention. The delegation came recently to Eritrea to evaluate the progress on the… The post Endeavours Toward Ensuring Food Security appeared first on…
  6. Roy Moore, Luther Strange to Have Runoff in Alabama Senate Race - Politics
    08.16 / 22:01
    Alabama’s “Ten Commandments judge,” Roy Moore, has forced President Donald Trump’s chosen candidate, Sen. Luther Strange, into a September primary runoff that pits cultural conservatives against the Republicans now running… Read more » The post Roy Moore, Luther Strange to Have Runoff in Alabama Senate Race appeared first on Hamodia. In related news: Meet Alabama’s New Senator: Luther Strange Repub John Kennedy Wins La. Senate Race, Giving GOP 52 S…
  7. Love, sex and the Balfour Declaration - Politics
    08.16 / 19:50
    Law professor Nathan Brau rescues a remarkable British Jew - Edwin Montagu - from the dustbin of history. He - strongly opposing Zionism in theory and practice - spoke and wrote a coherent anti-Zionist argument in his post as minister for India in Lloyd George's 1916-19…
  8. Yemen PM: Keep supporting AbduRabou until Allah finds an end to Yemen’s current crisis - Politics
    08.16 / 19:04
    By Dr. Ahmed Obaid Bin Daghar – Yemen Prime Minister Keep AbduRabou or Greeting AbdulMalik Now that you have returned, you have national responsibilities in front of you with many considerations. You are partners in maintaining the stability in Aden. The security of Aden has importance of which we have been paying attention to for…
  9. Trump’s Business Councils Disband as CEOs Repudiate President Over Charlottesville - Politics
    08.16 / 18:20
    President Donald Trump’s relationship with the American business community suffered a major setback on Wednesday as the president was forced to shut down his major business advisory councils after corporate… Read more » The post Trump’s Business Councils Disband as CEOs Repudiate President Over Charlottesville appeared first on Hamodia. In related news: Biz Leaders Quit Trump Panel After Charlottesville Comments Merck CEO Pulls Out of Trump Panel Over…
  10. Syrian army kills terrorists in Deir Ezzor - Politics
    08.16 / 17:51
    DEIR EZZOR, Aug. 16 (MNA) – Army and Armed Forces units, backed by the Syrian Air Force, carried out on Wednesday operations against gatherings and movements of ISIL terrorists in Deir Ezzor, killing many of them, including Saudi and Kuwaiti t…
  11. Israeli law expert backs Palestinian property rights - Politics
    08.16 / 17:50
    Land under Israeli control is not subject to the usual free market rules. There is a thicket of property law -Ottoman, British mandate, Jordanian Custodian of Enemy Property, Israeli and constant state interference. Since 1967 Israeli Jews have tried to reclaim their property. The Palestinians of Sheikh Jarrah have been defending their property from claimants and…
  12. UN urges Baghdad, Erbil to resolve disputes via dialogue - Politics
    08.16 / 16:44
    Tehran, Aug 16, IRNA – UN top official in Iraq on Wednesday urged the country's federal government and the autonomous Kurdish region to resolve their disputes via d…
  13. Hope Hicks Takes Interim White House Communications Role - Politics
    08.16 / 16:23
    Hope Hicks, President Donald Trump’s trusted confidante and adviser, is taking on expanded communications responsibilities while the White House searches for a communications director to replace Anthony Scaramucci, who was… Read more » The post Hope Hicks Takes Interim White House Communications Role appeared first on Hamodia. In related news: Sean Spicer Seeks More Strategic Role at White House White House Aide Boris Epshteyn Expected to Leave Communications Post…
  14. Iran's top general confers with Turkish president - Politics
    08.16 / 16:11
    Ankara, Aug 16, IRNA – Chief of Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces Major General Mohammad Hossein Baqeri on Wednesday discussed issues of mutual interest with Turkish President Recep Tayyip E…
  15. Non-interventionism guarantees regional security: Iran top general - Politics
    08.16 / 16:11
    Anakara, Aug 16, IRNA – Top Iranian commander on Wednesday stressed respecting sovereign states' territorial integrity, adding that adopting the policy of non-interference guarantees security, peace and stability of the r…
  16. Iran says US approach against text of nuclear deal - Politics
    08.16 / 14:27
    Tehran, Aug 16, IRNA - US approach and measures are against text of the nuclear deal reached between Iran and G5+1 (the US, the UK, France, China, Russia plus Germany), Foreign Ministry Spokesman said on…
  17. Egypt’s Al-Azhar Criticizes Gender Equality in Inheritance, Unlike Tunisia - Politics
    08.16 / 14:26
    Egypt’s Al-Azhar criticized the recent calls for equality between men and women in inheritance issues and said that it doesn’t comply with Islamic teachings. Al-Azhar made the announcement in response to the calls of the Tunisian President Beji Caid Essebsi to establish equality between men and women in terms of inheritance. While the announcement of Al-Azhar …
  18. Orthodox Jews in the US stay silent on white supremacy - Politics
    08.16 / 14:20
    The Council onAmerican-Islamic Relations managed it, so too did most Christian and reform Jewish bodies; even Mrs May had a go. Orthodox Jewry remained silent seeming to think if Jews are not the victims it's not worth bothering…
  19. PA ends security pact with Israel - Politics
    08.16 / 14:10
    Since the 1995 Oslo accord the Palestinian Authority has provided the political policing of the West Bank, working with the IDF's admin unit, COGAT. Since the Al-Aqsa gates debacle, the PA has become more outspoken and has announced it is ending its work with COGAT which aims to "consolidate the colonial system through illegal…
  20. Saudi Arabia no more a good work destination for Pakistanis - Politics
    08.16 / 13:53
    Islamabad, Aug 16, IRNA – Latest data from Pakistan’s Bureau of Emigration and Overseas Employment shows that manpower export to Saudi Arabia in the first six months of 2017 was just 17 percent of the total workers who went to the kingdom in entire 201…