The Unfolding Medicaid Story: Congress, Governors, And The Trump Administration

The Unfolding Medicaid Story: Congress, Governors, And The Trump Administration
  1. The Unfolding Medicaid Story: Congress, Governors, And The Trump Administration
    Anyone who has had the chance to witness (or be part of) any of the epic health reform dramas that continually play out in Washington D.C. will agree: in the end, it always comes down to Medicaid. We have once again arrived at one of those moments. The typical starting point for this continuing drama is the initial reaction to Medicaid’s sheer size and reach—16 percent of all health care spending in FY 2014, and 74 million people enrolled as of December 2016. These figures are e…

Anyone who has had the chance to witness (or be part of) any of the epic health reform dramas that continually play out in Washington D.C. will agree: in the end, it always comes down to Medicaid. We have once again arrived at one of those moments.

The typical starting point for this continuing drama is the initial reaction to Medicaid’s sheer size and reach—16 percent of all health care spending in FY 2014, and 74 million people enrolled as of December 2016. These figures are especially astonishing to the newly initiated when one compares them to where Medicaid was only 37 years ago in 1980—fewer than 20 million people enrolled, expenditures around $25 billion.

It is when one begins to consider the causes of Medicaid’s exponential growth that it begins to dawn on the observer just how complicated reforming the program can get. Medicaid size and scope are a reflection of profound drivers:

  • escalating poverty especially among families with children;
  • population demographics and an aging society;
  • the widespread erosion of employer coverage, particularly for lower income workers;
  • infant mortality and child development;
  • major advances in life-saving technology; and
  • public health crises both natural and manmade.

Over a half century, federal and state policymakers alike have turned to Medicaid because its flexible structure repeatedly has offered the ability to nimbly respond to social problems as they emerge—for example, ramping up relatively quickly in the face of immediate need, such as a recession, and then  scaling back. When the Zika crisis hit, states turned to Medicaid to immediately fund the intensive outreach and case management needed to help identify women and families at risk. Medicaid accounts for nearly half of all births, covers over one-third of all children, and accounts for nearly half of all long-term care spending. The program has enabled children with severe disabilities to attend school and adults with severe disabilities to work.

Thus, how to change Medicaid’s growth trajectory without weakening its unique and indispensable qualities represents perhaps the most significant of all U.S. health policy challenges. The rest of the nation’s intensely market-driven system, as well as Medicare, rests on Medicaid’s features and capabilities.

The debate over Medicaid is now playing out on three fronts.


The American Health Care Act, now moving through Congress, would make vast changes in the program. The measure would reduce Medicaid spending by $880 billion over a 10-year time frame, chiefly by 1) eliminating enhanced federal funding for the adult expansion population added to Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act and 2) introducing per-person spending limits pegged to medical inflation without a mechanism for adjusting federal spending to take real growth pressures into account. The bill would preserve states’ ability to recognize poor adults without ties to the traditional program as a distinct eligibility class, thereby permanently reconfiguring Medicaid as a program capable of serving as the nation’s principal insurer of the poor. At the same time, the bill would impose tremendous spending pressures on states by scaling back funding without commensurate changes to enable states to restructure their programs in terms of eligibility, enrollment, benefits and coverage, and cost-sharing.

The House of Representatives is poised to permit additional amendments when the bill reaches the floor.  Amendments under consideration would allow states to impose work requirements (a change long sought by some state Governors as part of their request for Medicaid demonstration authority under the Social Security Act’s section 1115 demonstration authority.  Amendments under review also would also give states the ability to run part or all of their Medicaid programs as block grants, although the actual block grant language contemplated by the House does not yet appear to exist.  If the ultimate language is patterned after earlier block grant bills, a new structure would place aggregate caps on federal spending and would separate the growth of that funding from changes in population, case mix, technology advances, or service intensity.

CBO has estimated that the House bill, as reported by the authorizing committees and without the addition of work requirement or block grant features, would not only reduce federal funding by almost $900 billion over a 10-year time frame but also result in 14 million fewer beneficiaries served by 2026, as states move to eliminate the ACA adult expansion population and make other changes in program scope. These estimates of the financial and human impact of the legislation are the cause of the controversy that surrounds it.

The Governors’ Letter

On March 16, in the face of the white-hot furor caused by the House bill, House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, received a lengthy letter from four highly influential Republican Governors—John Kasich (OH), Rick Snyder (MI), Brian Sandoval (NV) and Asa Hutchinson (AR)—all from expansion states and all considered Medicaid innovators. Only two days before, on March 14th, HHS Secretary Price and Seema Verma, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, had reached out to the Governors with their own invitation to help states adjust to new funding realities through the use of federal administrative authority.

The fact that the Governors wrote directly to Congressional leadership can only be interpreted as evidence that they do not see the path to Medicaid reform as one that winds through the long slow process of regulatory change, a process that in the end is limited both by the terms of the statute itself and the requirements—grounded in basic principles of democracy and due process—of the Administrative Procedure Act.  Nor do they see the HHS Secretary’s Section 1115 powers as the means to their end. Despite its breadth, section 1115 confers only narrow demonstration powers; grounded in the concept of research, these powers link Secretarial actions to strict requirements tied to Medicaid’s objectives and restrict demonstration undertakings to discreet and unique experiments that test and evaluate changes to Medicaid within the bounds of budget neutrality. (On March 16, Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Representative Frank Pallone (D-NJ) weighed in with a letter to Secretary Price reinforcing the limited nature of section 1115, objecting to the use of section 1115 to limit access to coverage among otherwise eligible people through work requirements and lock-out periods, and emphasizing Medicaid’s principal objective — to furnish medical assistance to people who cannot afford necessary health care).

Given the limits of federal agency authority, the Governors understandably want large-scale legislative action aimed at altering the very tenets of Medicaid law, reforms that give states the power to fundamentally reshape what is meant by the concept of medical assistance, coupled with major new cost containment tools. Offering concepts have been under discussion among states for years, the letter also makes clear that the Governors view Medicaid as essential to the health of their states’ low income and medically vulnerable populations. The letter raises fundamental objections to the House bill, which, in the Governors’ view, “provides almost no new legislative flexibility for states, does not ensure the resources necessary to make sure no one is left out, and shifts significant new costs to states.”

Reform tools sought by the Governors

What types of tools do Governors want in exchange for agreeing to new funding limits?

First – and perhaps most strikingly, — they want any state to be able to choose to keep Medicaid’s existing financing structure even as they transition off the ACA’s enhanced financing structure for the expansion population. Under this scenario, current Medicaid law (minus the enhanced match) would remain a “default” option for any state.

Second, the Governors want states that elect to do so to be able to alter Medicaid in far-reaching ways, moving to a per capita arrangement, a block grant, or a mix of the two. To that end, they seek the following legislative flexibilities and reforms in connection with a state’s selection of an alternative federal financing arrangement:

  • Allowing states to transition over time to either per capita financing or block grants, using a broad definition of what qualifies as a state expenditure for federal payment purposes (including funds transferred from local governments or generated through provider taxes) to define the scope of the federal contribution. (Depending on how alternative financing legislation is drafted, states still would be expected to make qualifying expenditures to be eligible for federal funding, whether calculated on a per capita basis or paid under an aggregate formula not adjusted for real population growth. Aware of this, the Governors naturally seek recognition of all lawful sources of state spending under current law);
  • Allowing states to choose between per-person payments or block grants for five distinct eligibility categories: working-age adults without minor children (aka childless adults), parents and caretaker relatives, children, pregnant women, and elderly and disabled persons;
  • An end to state funding through of Medicare cost-sharing for low-income people, as well as an end to the special federal Medicaid “clawback” that results in compulsory state funding of the Medicare Part D drug benefit;
  • Modification of the per capita cap formula to allow for certain types of spending that grow faster than simple inflation, as well as adjustments for “national economic events” such as a significant economic downturn;
  • A new federal block grant option, grounded on a flat state maintenance-of-effort payment rather than the traditional federal matching/state Medicaid expenditure approach. This new optional block grant structure would consist of three distinct block grant pools:
    • Part A covering low income working-age adults and children (other than those with disabilities), with coverage rules tied to fixed benchmarks, using as models CHIP for children and Medicaid’s earlier “benchmark” approach that was broadened under the ACA to parallel the “essential health benefit” standard;
    • Part B dedicated to long term services and supports, with Medicare assuming responsibility for all of Part D and for Medicare cost sharing; and
    • Part C covering medical services for individuals with disabilities and low-income seniors as well as others not covered under Part A. Costs associated with ongoing treatment for children and adults with disabilities, including all benefits and services required under Medicaid’s special early and periodic screening diagnosis and treatment (EPSDT) benefit for children, would be preserved, and federal funding for Part C would remain “open-ended”;
  • Allowing states to retain and reinvest savings generated either through a block grant or per capita cap approach;
  • Federal/state negotiated limits on states’ use of “supplemental payment” strategies in which certain providers (typically safety net health systems) receive supplemental payments separate from the payments received for the delivery of specified patient care;
  • Provision of supplemental federal funding to help states address the needs of certain populations including American Indians and Alaska Natives (particularly the long term services and support needs of tribal elders), emergency care for undocumented immigrants, refugee health care, and financing care for disaster victims not otherwise eligible for Medicaid; and
  • Additional relief for the U.S. territories

In addition, the Governors seek broad new legal powers:

  • the authority to place limits on enrollment “as states transition into per capita caps”;
  • the power to impose work requirements on “able-bodied” individuals, with the term able-bodied defined by each state;
  • flexibility regarding the use the “modified adjusted gross income” test (MAGI) begun under the ACA for determining income eligibility;
  • the power to reintroduce an asset test for low-income populations;
  • the “latitude to establish eligibility requirements that promote state-specific policy goals”
  • broader cost-sharing authority as well as “enforceable financial participation” by enrollees
  • the right to entirely exclude FDA-approved drugs from state Medicaid formularies;
  • the elimination of the “essential health benefit requirements added by the ACA, and the elimination of the enhanced level of coverage required under EPSDT except for children with disabilities and those in custody;
  • the elimination of non-emergency medical transportation as a required benefit;
  • the ability to mandate managed care enrollment for all beneficiaries other than American Indians and Alaska Natives, including certain special needs populations and Medicare/Medicaid dual enrollees, for whom special waivers must be obtained under current law;
  • broadening current health care delivery options beyond sanctioned managed care arrangements and control over provider network adequacy standards; and
  • loosening, although not eliminating, federal payment requirements for federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics by introducing new restrictions into the payment formula.

Finally, the Governors also seek an enhanced state role in rulemaking and the pre-rulemaking policy development phase of federal implementation of this redesigned statute, as Medicaid is moved away from its historic legislative moorings.

The Price/Verma Letter

On March 14, two days before the Governors letter to House Speaker Ryan and Senate Majority Leader McConnell arrived, HHS Secretary Price and CMS Administrator Verma sent a letter of their own to the Governors. The HHS Secretary obviously cannot do what the Governors seek, namely undertake a wholesale restructuring of the Medicaid statute. Instead, the letter essentially promises only what the Secretary can do: to use his policy-making and demonstration authority to make incremental changes in Medicaid that, other than on a circumscribed demonstration basis, must stay within the bounds of the law.

The HHS letter offers the Administration’s fundamental view of Medicaid, which contrasts sharply with the Governors’ vision: “The expansion of Medicaid through the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to non-disabled, working age adults without dependent children was a clear departure from the core, historical mission of the program.” This assertion stands in clear opposition not only to how the states want to use Medicaid, but also to the clear language of Medicaid law, and even to the AHCA, which permits states to fashion Medicaid to reach all low-income adults.

In other words, the Administration and the Governors begin this administrative courtship with fundamentally divergent views rega…

  1. ALP Predicts Mortality in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients With CKD-MBD - Medecine
    03.24 / 10:31
    Alkaline phosphatase was more strongly linked to mortality compared with other biomarkers of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone…
  2. Passive smoking—acrolein inhibits immune response, hence accelerating tumour growth - Medecine
    03.24 / 10:24
    The World Health Organisation (WHO) estimates that every year 600,000 deaths are caused by passive smoking worldwide and, in Austria alone, two or three people a day die as a result of passive smoking. In a study recently published in Scientific Reports, researchers from MedUni Vienna and the Messerli Research Institute have, for the first time, identified the organic compound acrolein (acrylic aldehyde) as one of the main causes of failure of the immune defence to tumours due to passive…
  3. Researchers gain insight into breast cancer drug resistance - Medecine
    03.24 / 10:24
    Breast cancer's ability to develop resistance to treatment has frustrated researchers and physicians and has thwarted even the latest and greatest targeted therapies. For example, after researchers identified a disease pathway integral to many breast cancers called PI3K, they began testing experimental drugs that block this pathway—only to see the tumors then activate another pathway to fuel their g…
  4. This Week In Race: ICE Sends Chills Across US, Kaepernick, Others, Write Big Checks - Medecine
    03.24 / 08:30
    Oh people: it's been one of those weeks again. The focus on immigration continues, as the government promises to punish sanctuary cities and cities that have chosen not to do ICE's work for it by detaining undocumented immigrants until that agency can collect them for deportation. A number of police departments, including the LAPD, have indicated widespread fear of deportation in immigrant communities has had deleterious effects on how the police do their jobs. Stories like this one just…
  5. Serenity Natural Health Center LLC Co-owner is First Certified Medical Reiki Master in Frederick - Medecine
    03.24 / 07:31
    Frederick, Maryland (PRWEB) March 24, 2017 Judy Buchanan, co-owner of Serenity Natural Health Center LLC, is the first Certified Medical Reiki™ Master in Frederick, MD. Judy says, “I am passionate about sharing Reiki as a holistic, complementary therapy with patients and their caregivers duri…
  6. Insurance FMO Launches New Online Learning & Leads Platforms - Medecine
    03.24 / 07:31
    Southlake, Texas (PRWEB) March 24, 2017 Empower Brokerage, located in Southlake, Texas, intends to make 2017 the year of enhancements, upgrading their training and leads programs. In February, 2017, Empower Brokerage introduced their new “Performance Partners” program to the Empower Unive…
  7. Gastro Health Partnering With HyGIeaCare® to Prep Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy in Miami, FL - Medecine
    03.24 / 07:31
    Miami, FL (PRWEB) March 24, 2017 Gastro Health (“GH”) ( ) and HyGIeaCare Inc. ( ) announced their partnership to prep patients for colonoscopy at the HyGIeaCare® Center that is to be located adjacent to the Gastro Health Endoscopy C…
  8. Running for Charity is One of the Upcoming Episodes of "Informed", with Host Rob Lowe - Medecine
    03.24 / 07:31
    (PRWEB) March 24, 2017 Viewers who like to educate themselves on current issues and who enjoy gaining knowledge on a variety of critical historical facts, cultural practices, goods, services, and societal issues tend to appreciate and love the "Informed" series, hosted by Rob…
  9. Westchester County Elder Law Firm Enea, Scanlan & Sirignano Welcomes New Attorney and Promotes Associate - Medecine
    03.24 / 07:31
    Westchester County, NY (PRWEB) March 24, 2017 The law firm of Enea, Scanlan & Sirignano, LLP, with offices in Somers and White Plains, N.Y., is pleased to announce Westchester resident Lauren C. Enea has joined the firm as an associate attorney. Ms. Enea, who previously served as a…
  10. Brain scans may help clinicians choose talk therapy or medication treatment for depression - Medecine
    03.24 / 07:07
    Researchers from Emory University have found that specific patterns of activity on brain scans may help clinicians identify whether psychotherapy or antidepressant medication is more likely to help individual patients recover from…
  11. Computer program developed to diagnose and locate cancer from a blood sample - Medecine
    03.24 / 07:07
    Researchers in the United States have developed a computer program that can simultaneously detect cancer and identify where in the body the cancer is located, from a patient's blood sample. The program is described in research published this week in the open access journal Genome…
  12. In Trump land, painful choices await if Obamacare goes - Medecine
    03.24 / 07:07
    Maribeth Coote says she hates Obamacare, but it's the only health coverage option she can afford in this remote, hardscrabble corner of southwestern…
  13. House Republicans Tweak AHCA Again; CBO Scores Earlier Changes - Medecine
    03.24 / 05:57
    It is now reported that the full House will vote on the American Health Care Act on Friday, March 24, 2017. Late on March 23, a further manager’s amendment was offered (summary here), apparently to pick up extra Republican votes. The bill would first delay the repeal of the Affordable Care Act’s additional Medicare tax on the wages of taxpayers exceeding $250,000 a year ($200,000 for single filers) from 2017 to 2022, and repeal a transition rule applying to the withholding of this tax by em…
  14. Five Ways to Protect Your Child From Household Poisons - Medecine
    03.24 / 05:00
    More than 2 million poisonings are reported each year to poison centers across the United States, and half those calls involve children under 6. As part of National Poison Prevention Week CHLA pediatric medical toxicologist Cyrus Rangan, M.D. shares tips for preventing poisoning in the…
  15. Good Technique Can Lower Golf Handicap, Prevent Injuries - Medecine
    03.24 / 05:00
    Just because there is no tackling, jumping or running does not mean golfers are immune to…
  16. House Postpones Vote On Republican Health Care Bill - Medecine
    03.24 / 04:17
    Copyright 2017 NPR. To see more, visit KELLY MCEVERS, HOST: And to help us understand what's happening on Capitol Hill tonight, I am joined by NPR's Ron Elving. Hello there, Ron. RON ELVING, BYLINE: Good to be with you, Kelly. MCEVERS: So tonight the president threatened that if the House does not vote on this tomorrow and does not pass their own health care bill, that he is going to move on and leave Obamacare in place. How serious a threat is that do you think? ELVING: It sounds pretty…
  17. After Delaying Vote, GOP Leaders Scramble To Save Health Care Bill - Medecine
    03.24 / 04:17
    Copyright 2017 NPR. To see more, visit KELLY MCEVERS, HOST: Republican leaders in Washington are scrambling to save their bill to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act. The House of Representatives was supposed to vote on the health care bill today, but with Republicans divided over just how far they should go with their changes, the vote was postponed. NPR congressional correspondent Susan Davis is following all this at the Capitol. Hi there, Sue. SUSAN DAVIS, BYLINE: Hey, Kelly.…
  18. Surprising Culprit in Nerve Cell Damage Identified - Medecine
    03.24 / 04:01
    In new research, scientists at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis have implicated a specific molecule in the self-destruction of axons, the wiring of the nervous system. Understanding just how that damage occurs may help researchers find a way to halt…
  19. Scientists Get Closer Look at Living Nerve Synapses - Medecine
    03.24 / 04:01
    The brain hosts an extraordinarily complex network of interconnected nerve cells that are constantly exchanging electrical and chemical signals at speeds difficult to comprehend. Now, scientists at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis report they have been able to achieve -- with a custom-built microscope -- the closest view yet of living nerve…
  20. When Remission Isn't Enough - Medecine
    03.24 / 01:15
    I’ve written in the past about how words are powerful—that they can have multiple meanings, how they can change depending on context. I am often reminded about how true that is in everyday oncology practice, especially when it comes to meeting new patients. Some are diagnosed with cancers that carry a relatively good prognosis, in which case there is reason for an optimistic outlook and for curative treatment. Others have more advanced disease or a poorer prognosis, in which case I tend to …