Brooks and Marcus on Trump’s threats for North Korea, thanks for Putin

Brooks and Marcus on Trump’s threats for North Korea, thanks for Putin
  1. Brooks and Marcus on Trump’s threats for North Korea, thanks for Putin
    Watch VideoJUDY WOODRUFF: And to the analysis of Brooks and Marcus. That’s New York Times columnist David Brooks and Washington Post deputy editorial page editor Ruth Marcus. Mark Shields is away. And we welcome both of you. So, you just heard two very different views from our earlier expert guests on North Korea. You heard the president again commenting, David, and now Senator Risch. How do you assess the president’s management of this North Korea situation? DAVID BROOKS, The…

JUDY WOODRUFF: And to the analysis of Brooks and Marcus. That’s New York Times columnist David Brooks and Washington Post deputy editorial page editor Ruth Marcus. Mark Shields is away.

And we welcome both of you.

So, you just heard two very different views from our earlier expert guests on North Korea.

You heard the president again commenting, David, and now Senator Risch. How do you assess the president’s management of this North Korea situation?

DAVID BROOKS, The New York Times: Unusual, I guess.


DAVID BROOKS: It will come after the war in Venezuela, apparently, we just learned. I don’t know what that was all about.

Listen, there’s been a consensus of how to deal with this extremely knotty problem. And that is, at least on the rhetorical level, the North Korean regime is extremely fiery, extremely insecure, sometimes hysterical.

And when you’re around somebody who’s screaming and unstable, the last thing you want to do is add to the instability with your own unstable, hysterical rhetoric.

And so most administrations, Republican and Democrats, when the North Koreans say they’re going to Seoul into a lake of fire, whatever their rhetoric is, have just ignored it and relied on some underlying sense that the North Koreans don’t want to commit national suicide.

Donald Trump has gone the other way. Now, I think that is still — that sense that neither party wants to go into a war is still there. But the psychological probabilities that you’re going to enter into some August 1914 miscalculation certainly go up when both people are screaming at the top of their lungs.

JUDY WOODRUFF: But, Ruth, you Justice Department heard Senator Risch, who says he talks to the White House. And he said: I have talked to the president, and we think being very clear with North Korea is the best way to go.

RUTH MARCUS, The Washington Post: Yes.

Well, David used the term unusual. I think it’s just absolutely scary. And I didn’t feel calmed down listening to Senator Risch, I have to say.

But there’s a couple of positive things to say about President Trump here, just to surprise people for a second. One is that this situation with North Korea is not his fault. In other words, we were going to get to this. Some president was going to end up in the terrible situation we have with the progress that North Korea has made with nuclear weapons. He just happens to be the president.

Number two, they were doing a very good job, until this latest eruptions of kind of bullying testosterone this week, in terms of pursuing what needs to be done, which is the diplomatic sanctions. Senator Risch is right about the achievement in the Security Council.

But, all of a sudden, we saw this week these statements, and you would have thought Tuesday that maybe it was an eruption and they’d tamp it down. And, instead, day after day after day, he’s coming out saying more scary and dangerous things.

And I do not understand how that is anything but destabilizing, and with a very already unstable ally.

JUDY WOODRUFF: I mean, David, people are — we have heard from world leaders, the Russians, the Chinese. We heard from Angela Merkel today. We hear from U.S. politicians.

Not all Republicans, but some Republicans, are joining the Democrats in saying, tone this down. But the president, no sign that he’s going to do that.


Well, it could be that he thinks the North Koreans are undeterrable, and that this is not a usual regime, maybe because they have this new leader, and that you actually do have to take action. He could be — he believes that.

It could be he just likes to blunder. It’s always dangerous to overinterpret what Donald Trump says at any one moment. And it could be he thinks the madman theory is right theory here. And the madman…

JUDY WOODRUFF: Remind everybody what the madman — because it sounds scary.


DAVID BROOKS: The madman theory is that you can be a successful deterrer if you — if they think you could be crazy.

And so I think it can be very effective, so long as you’re not actually crazy. And so we have a North Korean, we’re not really sure. We have a president who has his moments.

And so the madman theory, when both people could actually be crazy, is actually a very dangerous situation.


There’s two problems with the madman theory. Richard Nixon was a proponent of it, but that was kind of strategic and thought out. Donald Trump is no Richard Nixon. And is he going to really out-crazy — who’s going to out-crazy who here? That’s a scary thing.

There’s one other potential argument for what Trump is doing. And, as I say, I do not think this is the right way to go. The right way to go is quiet, determined diplomacy.

But he may not be trying to rattle the North Koreans and send a message to the North Koreans, as much as he’s trying to send a message to the Chinese, like, hey, I’m serious, you guys better get your act together here, or things are going to really escalate.

But this is way too high-stakes to be performing this way.

DAVID BROOKS: Yes, the only thing I would say to that is, we have all been — and interviewed or been around people who have been in combat. They never actually raise their voice.

If they have a message to send to the Chinese of that sort, they do it in a calm, serious way: I have been through this. I know what it is. You know who I am.

The people who raise their voices and say lock and load and say fire and fury, those are the people who have never actually been in combat. And he just reminds you so much of one of those people.

RUTH MARCUS: And speaking of combat, we really need to be clear, as you asked the senator. The military option is catastrophic. It’s just a question of how catastrophic.

That’s why no president has done it previously. Others have considered it and even come close. So, there are two options, pursue — two sensible options — pursue diplomacy or learn to live with the situation. We should be pursuing diplomacy.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Which is what all the — quote, unquote — “experts” are saying, just calm the rhetoric down and start thinking about how we have this dialogue that’s already been started. It’s still there.

The president’s going to hold a news conference, David, they just announced, on Monday. But he’s already been talking to the press. Yesterday, he made some statements that I guess are still being dissected, one of them about President Putin of Russia, thanking him for kicking out over 700 U.S. diplomats and saying, this is going to save the United States taxpayers money.

This is something — what Putin did has been criticized by everybody else we have heard of, including Republicans. How do we read this?


And, of course, the White House press office said it was sarcasm. Whenever Trump says something unusual, it’s always a joke.

RUTH MARCUS: And the president kind of repeated that in his last — his latest press conference.




DAVID BROOKS: And the — I think the significant thing here is that Russians monkeyed with our election.

And a lot of people in Congress, even Republicans, are upset by this. A lot of people around the country are upset by this have done — the Russians have done a lot of things to threaten the world order. And at every step along the way, including this little comment, Donald Trump always wants to walk that back, always wants to ratchet it back.

He’s willing to tweet angrily about members of his own party, about members of his own government, about anybody around the world, except for one person. And we can all either…

JUDY WOODRUFF: And that’s Putin.

DAVID BROOKS: And that’s Putin — and psychoanalyze or maybe political analyze. But it’s a consistent pattern with this guy.

JUDY WOODRUFF: It’s — it’s — what’s the word?


RUTH MARCUS: Well, continuing my effort to find some theory here, you could argue that perhaps President Trump was trying to show that Putin, uniquely among people, was not getting under his skin, that his little sanctions weren’t bothering him.

So, if we didn’t have — if it was just this one episode, I don’t think it would have had the kind of global response of, oh, my lord, what’s going on here that it did. It’s the broader setting of all the ways in which Trump has consistently failed to stand up to Putin, or to stand up to Russian meddling, or to even actually assert that he acknowledges that it existed in the election.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Well, someone who has gotten under his skin is the Senate majority leader, as we just mentioned.

I just asked Senator Risch about it, David. The president has gone out of his way three or four times in a row now to go after the majority leader, the Republican leader in the Senate, for failing to get health care reform passed.

Does he — he’s venting. He’s clearly unhappy and frustrated. But does he run the risk of jeopardizing some of the other things he wants to get done this…

  1. Trump Again Slams Media Amid Charlottesville Fiasco - Politics
    08.21 / 11:42
    Trump, Melania and Barron were seen boarding Air Force One at Morristown Municipal Airport in New Jersey Follows two tumultuous weeks that saw increased criticism about …
  2. President Putin orders to cut number of business inspections by December 1 - Politics
    08.21 / 11:40
    Russian President Vladimir Putin has ordered the government to introduce amendments to the legislation to reduce the number of business inspections by December 1, according to a relevant ruling published on the Kremlin’s website. According to the ruling, the number of unscheduled inspections should not exceed 30% of the planned i…
  3. We’ve Caught a Glimpse of Northrop’s Carrier-Launched Tanker Drone - Politics
    08.21 / 11:34
    David Axe Security, The refueling pod-carrying X-47B is a contender for a U.S. Navy contract The U.S. Navy’s future drone tanker has begun to break cover. In mid-August 2017, the first photos appeared depicting Northrop Grumman’s entry in the Navy’s Carrier-Based Aerial Refueling System, or CBARS — the years-long effort to produce the first drone warplane for the Navy’s carrier air wings. The photos, obtained by trade publication Aviation Week, depict one of Northrop’s X-47B jet-powered…
  4. How the U.S. Military Planned to Crush Russia if World War III Happened: Nuclear 'Big Guns' - Politics
    08.21 / 11:34
    Sebastien Roblin Security, Nuclear artillery shells could have been the ultimate weapon--or not.  Despite modernized communication systems, the Pentomic division also posed command-and-control problems. The colonel in charge of a battle group had to direct five to nine companies at a time once typical supporting units were accounted for, rather than the three to five a battalion commander would normally have to deal with. This was more than most officers could efficiently keep track …
  5. The Sycophants Have Spoken: The Dangerous World Of The Trump Narcissism Machine - Politics
    08.21 / 11:25
    Do Trump's sycophants have any power? If so, they may be the most dangerous part of his…
  6. Amerika: The Mad Magazine of 2017 - Politics
    08.21 / 11:25
    Mad Magazine Amerika will have more issues to excite you in the near future. After his disgraceful Charlottesville comments, the leash on 'The Donald' is tightening, too much for any demagogue to handle. Once the heat gets too…
  7. The Latest: No motive yet as van rams Marseille bus stops - Politics
    08.21 / 11:21
    The Latest on a van ramming two bus stops in the French port city of Marseille (all times local): 12:20 p.m. A Marseille police official confirms reports that a van … Click to Continue…
  8. The Latest: Big Ben's bell goes silent for years of repairs - Politics
    08.21 / 11:21
    The Latest on Big Ben's bell going silent (all times local): 12 p.m. Britain's Big Ben has bonged the hour for the last time ahead of almost four years of … Click to Continue…
  9. North Korea Warns Australia: U.S. Military Alliance a ‘Suicidal Act’ - Politics
    08.21 / 11:15
    Australia's decision to publicly support the U.S. in any possible future military conflict with North Korea has been called a "suicidal act" by…
  10. Report: Free Speech Is Best Remedy for Neutralizing Hate Groups - Politics
    08.21 / 11:15
    While censorship might seem to be the best antidote to hate speech, in reality it strengthens fringe groups, while free speech neutralizes them, a new report…
  11. Mnuchin rebuffs calls from former Yale classmates to resign, defends Trump -Politics
    08.21 / 11:07
    Treasury secretary defends president's response to…
  12. Trump’s generals 'have to stay' in Cabinet to 'right the ship': Obama official -Politics
    08.21 / 11:07
    Former Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson spoke of Mattis, Kelly,…
  13. Trump 'doesn't live here': Richmond mayor says of Confederate statue debate -Politics
    08.21 / 11:07
    Mayor of Richmond, Virginia, talked about the debate over Confederate…
  14. The Note: Trump returns to a lonelier Washington after damage of Charlottesville -Politics
    08.21 / 11:07
    Trump makes his 3rd primetime address to the nation…
  15. Which charities have canceled galas at Mar-a-Lago Club? How much money is at stake? Catch up on the story with our Q&A. -Politics
    08.21 / 11:07
    Mar-a-Lago is facing an unusually slow season. Even before the exodus, it had only 16 galas on the schedule for next winter, as compared to 21 in the year before, and 26 in its best…
  16. American voters are politically flexible. Why aren't our parties? - Politics
    08.21 / 11:05
    In the United States, we have had only two electorally viable political parties for more than a century and a half now. One is run by center-right economic moderates who pretend to have convictions about the so-called "social issues" — abortion, civil rights, homosexuality, sex-neutral bathrooms, contraception, and so on. The other is the GOP. We are so used to hearing about the problem of divided government that we forget about the degree to which our two parties agree on a huge number of …
  17. Bannon was meant for another age - Politics
    08.21 / 11:05
    The first lapsed Catholic, self-described Leninist-Satanist, pro-darkness Sith aficionado, and erstwhile video-game-gold entrepreneur to hold the office of White House chief strategist has, by mutual agreement with White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, resigned from his position following interviews in which he mocked his boss, his colleagues, and the coterie of neo-pseudomedicine enthusiasts popularly known as the "alt-right." Stephen K. Bannon's tenure in the White House was…
  18. Reese Witherspoon Attends ‘Home Again’ Premiere Amid ‘Big Little Lies’ Sequel Rumors

    IBTimes - Politics
    08.21 / 11:03
    Reese Witherspoon recently attended the premiere of “Home Again” in East Hampton over the wee…
  19. Trump won places drowning in despair. Can he save them?
    08.21 / 11:03
  20. Battling demons in a community looking to Trump for change
    08.21 / 11:03